<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Influence and Similarity in Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bleech.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/influence-and-similarity-in-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bleech.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/influence-and-similarity-in-photography/</link>
	<description>Michael Dashkin Blogs About Art, Books, Cities and Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:35:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://bleech.wordpress.com/2008/11/20/influence-and-similarity-in-photography/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bleech.wordpress.com/?p=434#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I agree that the comments following the blog post are provocative: one comment highlights a point that I agree with: that the selection of photographs that are printed (or posted, in this case) are chosen by an editorial team at the publication. Danziger&#039;s discussion doesn&#039;t clearly point this out, and there&#039;s a slight tinged of criticism, in my opinion, coming from him aimed at the photographer herself, for taking photos so similar, when in fact, I quess that it&#039;s only a couple of images curated out a much bigger portfolio of photographs she took during her covering the Obama campaign.

Also, a more important point: Danziger writes that &quot;there is a slideshow of 14 different images taken mostly through the window of Obama’s bus, but also from a campaign train.&quot;

If you go to look at the 14 photos posted at Time.com, there is in actuality only 6 of the 14 that resemble the &quot;from the RFK train&quot; point of view. The majority of them--eight--are from rallies or are different in nature, such as several shots looking &quot;out from the front of the bus towards the road ahead&quot;  My 2cents.. thanks..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the comments following the blog post are provocative: one comment highlights a point that I agree with: that the selection of photographs that are printed (or posted, in this case) are chosen by an editorial team at the publication. Danziger&#8217;s discussion doesn&#8217;t clearly point this out, and there&#8217;s a slight tinged of criticism, in my opinion, coming from him aimed at the photographer herself, for taking photos so similar, when in fact, I quess that it&#8217;s only a couple of images curated out a much bigger portfolio of photographs she took during her covering the Obama campaign.</p>
<p>Also, a more important point: Danziger writes that &#8220;there is a slideshow of 14 different images taken mostly through the window of Obama’s bus, but also from a campaign train.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you go to look at the 14 photos posted at Time.com, there is in actuality only 6 of the 14 that resemble the &#8220;from the RFK train&#8221; point of view. The majority of them&#8211;eight&#8211;are from rallies or are different in nature, such as several shots looking &#8220;out from the front of the bus towards the road ahead&#8221;  My 2cents.. thanks..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
